Misconduct of Akram J. Atallah - CEO of Identity Digital Inc.
Akram J. Atallah, as CEO of Identity Digital Inc., is complicit in the coordinated misconduct carried out by Defendants Shein Distribution Corporation and their attorneys.
Atallah bears direct responsibility for one of the most egregious acts of retaliatory censorship in this case: the unauthorized, unexplained, and unjustified takedown of my protest websites—including Diinele.com, which had no connection to the defendants’ alleged grievances. As the executive with final authority over Name.com and its abuse infrastructure, Atallah had both the power and the duty to prevent misuse of his company’s systems by outside parties acting in bad faith.
Despite being repeatedly notified that the takedowns were retaliatory, coordinated with Shein and its attorneys, and possibly criminal in nature, Atallah refused to restore my websites or offer any explanation. Instead, he allowed my open abuse complaints to go unanswered, ignored lawful subpoenas, and permitted his legal counsel to stonewall communication under the guise of delay, all while litigation against Shein was actively unfolding.
Even when I offered to dismiss my claims against Name.com entirely in exchange for transparency and minimal assurances, Atallah refused to cooperate, confirming his alignment with those attempting to suppress my legal claims and public speech. His silence, in the face of documented retaliation, was not neutrality—it was an endorsement of corporate censorship and a betrayal of the responsibilities entrusted to domain registrars under U.S. law and ICANN standards.
Atallah’s continued refusal to correct the record, respond to misconduct, or distance himself from the false declaration submitted by BHFS attorney Eric Walther (which falsely attributed the takedown to a “spam campaign”) shows that he is not a passive actor.
He is a knowing participant in a conspiracy to obstruct justice, suppress public advocacy, and retaliate against a vulnerable litigant asserting her lawful rights. He and Identity Digital must now be held fully accountable—civilly, professionally, and criminally.
Federal Violations
- 1 - 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy against rights If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same.....They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
- 2 - 18 U.S.C. § 1512(2) Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant Whoever uses physical force or the threat of physical force against any person, or attempts to do so, with intent to (B) cause or induce any person to (ii) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the integrity or availability of the object for use in an official proceeding shall be punished as provided in paragraph (3).
- 3 - 18 U.S.C. § 1343 Fraud by wire, radio, or television Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
- 4 - 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) Prohibited activities It shall be unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the provisions of subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section.
California Business and Professions Violations
- 1 - BPC § 17500 False or Misleading Advertising It is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation or association, or any employee thereof with intent directly or indirectly to dispose of real or personal property or to perform services, professional or otherwise, or anything of any nature whatsoever or to induce the public to enter into any obligation relating thereto, to make or disseminate or cause to be made or disseminated before the public in this state, or to make or disseminate or cause to be made or disseminated from this state before the public in any state, in any newspaper or other publication, or any advertising device, or by public outcry or proclamation, or in any other manner or means whatever, including over the Internet, any statement, concerning that real or personal property or those services, professional or otherwise, or concerning any circumstance or matter of fact connected with the proposed performance or disposition thereof, which is untrue or misleading, and which is known, or which by the exercise of reasonable care should be known, to be untrue or misleading, or for any person, firm, or corporation to so make or disseminate or cause to be so made or disseminated any such statement as part of a plan or scheme with the intent not to sell that personal property or those services, professional or otherwise, so advertised at the price stated therein, or as so advertised. Any violation of the provisions of this section is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500), or by both that imprisonment and fine.
- 2 - BPC § 17200 Unlawful, Unfair, and Fraudulent Business Acts As used in this chapter, unfair competition shall mean and include any unlawful, unfair or fraudulent business act or practice and unfair, deceptive, untrue or misleading advertising and any act prohibited by Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17500) of Part 3 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code.
© 2025 COMPLAINT.LEGAL All Rights Reserved.
